COMPARATIVE CHARACTERISTIC OF DEVELOPMENT PREDICTORS OF PAPILLOMOVIRUS INFECTION
WITH HIGH-ONCOGENIC RISK IN MEN AND WOMEN 

Lysenko Ol'ga Vasil'evna, Doctor of medical sciences, professor, sub-department of dermatovenereology, South Ural State Medical University (24 Yablochkin street, Chelyabinsk, Russia), olga_lisenko@bk.ru
Koksharova Irina Sergeevna, Postgraduate student, South Ural State University (24 Yablochkin street, Chelyabinsk, Russia), potapova164@mail.ru

616.5

10.21685/2072-3032-2018-1-10

Background. Human papillomavirus infection (PVI) is one of the most common viral infections. Her strains with a high oncogenic risk currently attract considerable attention. Their features are well studied in women, but rarely described in men. The aim of this work is to identify and compare predictors of human papillomavirus infection of high-risk types for men and women.
Materials and methods. PCR surveyed 436 people aged 18 to 38 years. At 223 (51.3 %) of people discovered the human papillomavirus (HPV) high-risk types. Predictors were studied using questionnaires.
Results. HPV high-risk types detected in 57.4 % of women and 42.6 % of men who applied to the dermatologist. The average age of onset of sexual activity in men was significantly lower. The average number of sexual partners was twice the figure for women. Sexually transmitted infections with other pathogens occurred in 6.3 % of men and 7.8 % women.
Conclusions. The larger percentage of the predictors for the development of papillomavirus among men requires more attention and examination of all the sexual partners of women infected with HPV of high oncogenic risk.

papilomavirusy infection, STI

1. Evstigneeva N. P. Papillomavirusnaya infektsiya urogenital'nogo trakta zhenshchin: epidemiologiya, faktory persistentsii, optimizatsiya ranney diagnostiki i profilaktiki onkogeneza: avtoref. dis. d-ra med. nauk [Papillomavirus infection of the women urogenital tract: epidemiology, persistence factors, optimization of early diagnosis and prophylaxis of oncogenesis: author's abstract of dissertation to apply for the degree of the candidate of medical sciences]. Moscow, 2007.
2. Lysenko O. V., Telesheva L. F., Troyanova A. V. Sovremennye problemy dermatovenerologii, immunologii i vrachebnoy kosmetologii [Modern problems of dermatovenereology, immunology and medical cosmetology]. 2013, vol. 8, no. 3 (26), pp. 49–55.
3. Telesheva L. F., Lysenko O. V., Troyanova A. V. Rossiyskiy immunologicheskiy zhurnal [Russian immunology journal]. 2014, vol. 8, no. 3 (17), pp. 876–879.
4. Solov'ev A. M. Vestnik dermatologii i venerologii [Bulletin of dermatology and venereology]. 2011, no. 5, pp. 146–151.
5. Aubin F., Pretet J.-L., Jacquard A.-C. et al. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2008, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 610–615.
6. Allen A. L., Siegfried A. C. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 2000, vol. 12, pp. 365–369. 7. Bagramova G. E., Gureeva M. A., Khlebnikova A. N., Molochkov A. V. Klinicheskaya dermatologiya i venerologiya [Clinical dermatology and venereology]. 2011, no. 6, pp. 47–50.
8. Garland S. M., Steben M., Sings H. L. et al. JID. 2009, vol. 199, no. 15, pp. 805.
9. Molochkov A. V. Lechashchiy vrach [Attending medical doctor]. 2009, no. 5, pp. 37–41.